5 TIPS ABOUT CFE223 VS H335 YOU CAN USE TODAY

5 Tips about cfe223 vs h335 You Can Use Today

5 Tips about cfe223 vs h335 You Can Use Today

Blog Article

Have usually read that 335 metered terrific. Do TAC and Benchmark behave just as very well from the powder thrower? To the record I just bought a pound of Benchmark but it had been a straightforward preference, only 223 appropriate powder I could find area.

Quoted: H-335 is a common .223 Rem powder and was oft suggested by ballistician Ed Matunas who did several reloading manuals as a powder that shot perfectly in a variety of rifles.  Originally a navy surplus powder, it is currently newly-produced for Hodgdon.   Additionally, since it is actually a ball powder, it meters much better than lengthy-grain IMR 3031.

I weigh Verify on the size, one out of every 10 I cost with powder by dumping the charge out inside the pan, confirming the charge body weight and afterwards Placing the powder back in the case.

Most of his posts is often alarming into the everyday customer to this forum until you will get a truly feel for what he does.

I have shot many WC844 (armed service comparable to H335) and WC846 (armed service W748 or BallC2) and have never had the slightest trace of ignition hassle.   Poodleshooter

I do have a small little bit of practical experience with CFE 223.  I've a Hornady electronic powder measure/scale I take advantage of for that hard powders (like IMR4198 - my beloved .223 powder for tiny teams) that just won't toss constant expenses by way of a powder measure.  I purchased a 1 lb. bottle of CFE223 to test with 55 grain bullets.  I utilized that Digital measure/scale and that powder drove that Digital unit wild.  Wild?  For some explanation that powder saved giving me overweight expenses.

A broad collection of powders with the correct melt away fee can be employed to enhance .308 Winchester velocity and precision.

I'v go through loading all copper bullets: again off charge two complete grains and slim go through A further that says the grooves in the ttsx helps you to load similar to any bullet of very same excess weight???

Lots of .223 shooters have burned get more info loads of H335, since for really a while it had been amongst the greater ball powders accessible for The task. It metered properly from a powder measure and typically shot fairly accurately.

2 grains instead of exceed 3100 fps. The outcomes posted from the handbook for an extended barrel do generate bigger values, but it surely would appear that the worth in the NATO ammunition in that barrel would generate even higher values.

By choosing continue you validate that you've study our data protection facts and approved our basic stipulations.

I reload on a progressive Dillon RL550B whose automatic powder evaluate is renown for not liking stick powders. Many a long time back I switched to typically ball or quick Lower powders and H335 is really a mainstay powder for loads from 223 to 45-70. And that's why the aside is significant to me.

Gunshop didn't have the powder I was looking for but a pound of the identified as out my identify And that i took it home another working day.

The posting details out by illustration the error of employing load details for one maker’s bullet on A further’s bullet of various design but the exact same fat. Being an apart, a recognised (to not me!) challenge with H335 is exposed.

Report this page